Abstract: Transnational crime stands at the forefront of contemporary enforcement priorities, yet conflicts of jurisdiction persistently hinder its effective disposition. Drawing on transnational illegal trade in wildlife and wildlife products involving China and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries, this Article identifies the underlying difficulty as the inadequacy of legal arrangements, both in domestic legislation and in bilateral and multilateral treaties, to resolve such conflicts. The principal mechanism for resolving them is the transfer of criminal proceedings. Two illustrative cases involving China, Myanmar, and Vietnam expose the present-day gaps; comparative analysis of the European experience demonstrates how a mature transfer regime, anchored in the principles of double criminality, ne bis in idem, and the proper administration of justice, can supply that resolution. The construction of a transfer mechanism between China and the ASEAN States is both necessary and feasible. Taking the disposition of transnational illegal wildlife trade cases as its working model, this Article proposes a transfer mechanism for transnational criminal cases that is distinctively suited to China, and structured around clear preconditions for transfer, an orderly procedure for initiation, review, and execution, and the protection of the rights of defendants and victims.